
Not worth my 99 cents
Two weeks ago, bloggers and Twitterers got angry about the return of a pretty terrible idea: small payments for each newspaper article, or micropayments. Former TIME managing editor Walter Isaacson thought he had saved newspapers, Steven Brill agreed, and David Carr was all, “Let’s make an iTunes for newspapers“.
The idea won’t work for a variety of practical reasons, outlined best by Clay Shirky and Steve Outing. Basically, people don’t like getting nickel and dimed; iTunes was created to sell iPods, not music; and journalism micropayments fail elsewhere.
But even if micropayments would work, I don’t think newspapers should adopt them because micropayments would further divide society on political lines. In a micropayment system, I won’t be interested in spending money on an article criticizing Obama, and my conservative father won’t be interested in spending money on an article criticizing Bush. People end up only reading what confirms their opinions, and the base of facts that everyone agrees on grow ever smaller.
Knowing even a little Flash can add a new dimension to your journalism. Here’s why Flash journalism guru Mindy McAdams thinks 


Georgetown has two competing papers:
Me with the patron saint of journalism
I'm Will Sommer, a student reporter excited about journalism's transition to the internet, new ways to tell stories online, and how to make it all profitable.
