
Not worth my 99 cents
Two weeks ago, bloggers and Twitterers got angry about the return of a pretty terrible idea: small payments for each newspaper article, or micropayments. Former TIME managing editor Walter Isaacson thought he had saved newspapers, Steven Brill agreed, and David Carr was all, “Let’s make an iTunes for newspapers“.
The idea won’t work for a variety of practical reasons, outlined best by Clay Shirky and Steve Outing. Basically, people don’t like getting nickel and dimed; iTunes was created to sell iPods, not music; and journalism micropayments fail elsewhere.
But even if micropayments would work, I don’t think newspapers should adopt them because micropayments would further divide society on political lines. In a micropayment system, I won’t be interested in spending money on an article criticizing Obama, and my conservative father won’t be interested in spending money on an article criticizing Bush. People end up only reading what confirms their opinions, and the base of facts that everyone agrees on grow ever smaller.
Even when people paid for newspaper content, they could buy the paper for one reason and end up reading something that challenged their worldviews, and share that article with their friends for free. In Brill’s payment plan, though, sharing an article with someone else would cost five cents. I’m not going to waste five cents on the off-chance of setting someone straight when it could just get me another Paul Krugman article.
Under a successful micropayment system, society would grow more polarized. But hey, at least newspapers wouldn’t ever have to change.
By the way, if you needed more proof that Isaacson is behind the times, he calls the EZTag toll system a “gizmo”. EZTag’s convenient, but it’s hardly a gizmo.
Photo from Doublespeak with Matthew and Peter Slutsky used under a Creative Commons license
Our Random Articles
- The 1st document to find when covering a college
- BBC to open up thousands of training documents
- Guidestar and the Joy of 990 Forms
- Interviewing tips from John Ullman's Investigative Reporting
- Politico memo shows what questions lead to quality content
More Links
I'm Will Sommer, a student reporter excited about journalism's transition to the internet, new ways to tell stories online, and how to make it all profitable.

3 Comments
The political scientist in me loves this point. People already tend to gravitate towards news that reaffirms their beliefs, and charging for it is only going to increase that tendency.
I’ve got my own feeling on why micro-payments are bad for democracy: they kill the Fourth Estate by leading to piracy.
And if there’s one thing the music industry can teach us, it’s that you don’t want to invite pirates into your business model.
Trackback & Pingback